Is an interview to judge our 14 + 3 or above years of education or just the 10 minutes clarity answers which favours them? I know it’s technically hypothical question. But the irony is, it’s a tuck of war between the interviewer and the one who is undergoing the interview. Both wants to outwit each other. If both of them is satisfied, then there won’t be any problem on either side and the match would end up in draw with a curvy lives on both sides.
Within this 3 months period, one of my friend haunted for the job. Unfortunately, either she didn’t get through in the last round or didn’t get the expected salary.
I wonder, where to find the reason and mistake. Atlast, I understood, we live in a planet, where we pay and study for 14 years for basic education. After finishing that education, the institute thinks that their responsibility has been over, after making the ward get through the exam. From that moment, they think that they are not responsible for the ward’s life.
Does it sounds correct?
I strongly disagree with this type of behavior from the institute. The Government should make it mandatory that the school or the institutes provides atleast 2 month support to clear the wards confusion in taking the career course. I also agree that there are many colleges and NGOs are conducting a free guidence for the students to select various courses. But, in my point of view, only the school knows the strength and aim of the students. So, they also should help the needy. Atleast, it would help 10% of the future generation to get well paid job or their dream job.
To be continued..